Describe the behavior.
Add a requirement and clear acceptance criteria, either manually or from Markdown. Give the analysis a specific question to investigate.
Inspect NANO-003Connect what a project should do to the source that might support it. Follow the files, inspect the tests, and make the review decision with the evidence in view.
The independent Nano ID study shows this process with a checklist derived from its public documentation. The same workspace pattern supports an owner’s own requirements.
Add a requirement and clear acceptance criteria, either manually or from Markdown. Give the analysis a specific question to investigate.
Inspect NANO-003Open candidate implementation matches with file paths, symbols and line numbers. Each GitHub citation points to the captured revision.
Open the evidence drawerRead the matching tests and inspect GitHub Actions for the same commit. Test source, a workflow result and a reviewed acceptance criterion answer different questions.
Inspect the captured CI recordReview each criterion, inspect missing evidence and export the release report. Copilot can explain the same records with citations.
Open review & export reportThis version is built around one signed-in owner and one repository. It supports TypeScript and JavaScript source, with requirements entered manually or imported as Markdown.
Check deployment configurationOversized or incomplete imports are rejected. Saved analysis also has a separate database size limit. Teams, multiple repositories, webhook resync and automatic code changes are outside this MVP.
Live pilot, with a defined scope. The pilot at soficore.space uses Vercel, Firebase Authentication and Firestore. Sign-in, the read-only GitHub App, private repository import and saved-result reload have been exercised on the live site. Pilot access is by invitation; contact info@soficore.space.